Blade Runner, Faith, Film, God, Movies, Origins, Prometheus, religion, Ridley Scott, Science
Prometheus opens with great promise delivered on a grand scale. It is a quest to find the origins of life on earth, a journey to meet our makers. I had entered the theater primed with expectation (the promos for this film were brilliant), and upon learning where the story would take us, I smiled and settled into my seat. Seriously, I couldn’t wait to see what new directions Ridley Scott might take with this wonderful theme.
Sadly, the answer was right into the ground.
Because the big crash of a spaceship at the end of this flick was the perfect metaphor for the movie as a whole. It was just one big
train space-ship wreck.
…complete with main characters running directly away from the rolling wheel-like space ship instead of jumping to the side. Yes, they actually did that. Seriously, how does a movie studio spend so many millions of dollars on special effects and star power only to miss the fact that they put a Loony Tunes gag in the middle of the dramatic climax of the story? Or do they just think we are that stupid?
Maybe we are. …Damn!
Don’t get me wrong. I like really cool special effects as much as the next guy. But I also like an interesting story. Is it really too much to ask that they appear in the same film?
Ridley Scott has produced such films! Alien was such a film. More to the point, Blade Runner was such a film. And one of the best things about Blade Runner was its use of the very same theme.
Blade Runner was a classic Philip K. Dick story. Few authors could make something so fantastic speak to people in such personal ways, and Ridley Scott transmitted that to the screen brilliantly. Do you remember Roy’s encounter with his maker? Do you remember watching as this replicant interrogates his very creator, trying desperately to wheedle extra time out of the very man who had chosen to the hour of Roy’s demise? And do you remember how easily the story acquired its deeper significance, that moment when a simple plot point about a creature trying to extend its life acquired philosophical significance?
For all his artificial nature, Roy stood before his maker asking questions about the very meaning of mortality. They were questions we could all recognize. Questions that touched deeply on what it means to be human, what it means to live for only a little while.
And in that moment when the character of Roy stands before his maker and demands to know the reason for his imminent death, he became so very human.
…still more so in the moment of his passing:
What makes Roy’s story so compelling is not merely that we can see the metaphor, but that the metaphor is used to tell us something about our own humanity. It is not merely the loss of personal life that Roy mourns. It is also the passing of his experiences into oblivion, experiences that could be of real value to someone. He is a remarkable character, to be sure, and the world will lose something as he passes.
…just as it does with the passing of each of our loved ones.
…just as it will for each and every one of us.
Roy meets his maker to confront his own mortality, and he takes us along for the ride. We are there, not just to witness the action, but to share in the meaning of that encounter. …perhaps even to share in the crime of deicide when Roy executes his own verdict on his maker.
And what of Prometheus?
As Roger Ebert tells us, Prometheus raises questions about the origin of human life, presenting us with a version of the panspermia hypothesis in which all of life on earth is begun through the apparent suicide of a pale muscular alien. In the opening scenes that alien appears alone on a barren plant, his spaceship leaving without him. With all the solemnity of a priest performing a great ritual, the alien consumes a mysterious substance, and it ravishes his body. As the mysterious alien falls into a rushing river, his body disintegrates, releasing the seeds of life into a new world.
Was this earth, as Roger Ebert suggests? Ridley Scott tells us that it could be any planet, but of course the point of the scene is to raise the possibility. This might have been how life on earth started, so we are asked to believe. More to the point, it may well be how life on planet earth will begin anew, if the “engineers” as these aliens are called, should choose to return.
That is the possibility uncovered by our main characters in Prometheus. They set out in a quest to find the engineers, to speak with our very creators only to find them bent on our destruction. And thus the a question about the origin of life on earth transforms into a question about the possibility of its imminent demise. The two questions are really the same, because each is essentially a question about the motives of the engineers.
This SHOULD have been a brilliant movie. What makes it so sad is the inattention to narrative detail. The scientists do not act like scientists, especially the geologist who’s rabid anti-intellectualism belies his choice of career. Seriously, didn’t someone on set know that geology is a science? But of course this is a side character, and his flaws are forgivable. What of the main characters?
Three people drive the quest to find the engineers in Prometheus. Two archaeologists, Elizabeth Shaw and Charlie Holloway (played by Noomi Rapace and Logan Marshall Green) initiate the quest to find the engineers as a result of the result of their own findings. Holloway is so intent on speaking with the engineers that he engages in reckless actions upon landing. Believing the engineers to be dead, he drowns his sorrows in a bottle. I suppose we are meant to appreciate the irony of a scholar lamenting the greatest archeological find in the history of the field, but I for one could not get past the absurdity of it. Shaw could almost have served as a voice of reason were it not for her complete irrelevance in the lead-up to the final conflict. No-one listens to her (least of all her husband and partner Holloway), right up until she ends up as the sole human survivor of the expedition.
…which is to say that no-one ever listens to her.
And then of course there is Peter Weyland (played by Guy Pearce). A wealthy old man facing the end of his own life, Weyland funds the expedition for the sole purpose of extending his life. How he came to the conclusion that the engineers would extend his life is beyond me? I think it was beyond the writers themselves? Whatever its origins, Weyland holds onto this assumption despite all evidence to the contrary. Long after it has been made clear that the engineers bear no goodwill towards their creation, Weyland chooses to speak with one of them. It was a foolish mistake.
…and it was his last one.
And here we have the crux of the problem.This movie doesn’t really raise any questions about the origins of life at all. The prospect that life on earth might have its origins in the stars is simply a premise designed to kick-start the action. Nothing about the unfolding action sheds any light on the significance of that premise, nor does it begin share that significance with anyone in the audience.
The central meaning of the encounter with the engineers rests on the irrational presuppositions of Holloway, Shaw, and Weyland. Each of them has loaded the event with significance particular to their own stories, their reasons for doing so barely explored in the course of the film. This sort of approach might have worked with some earnest character development, but Prometheus was too busy wowing us with majestic visuals and sudden moments of terror. In the end, this film attaches no genuine meaning to the event at all.
And so the encounter with the makers of humanity does not quite resonate the way it could have. The encounter with the engineers is an intrinsically interesting moment, one spoiled terribly by the lack of a meaningful storyline to carry us through it. Unlike Roy, these characters bring no great questions to their creator; seeking instead to learn whatever he chooses tell them. But he tells them nothing, electing instead to begin smashing up its creation.
…which actually sums up this movie pretty well.
I have to thank my friend Michael Kucan for helping me to remember some of the more irritating details of this movie. I would also like to recommend aknittysociety blog, which contains a wonderful analysis of race and gender in Prometheus. I should also say that in my thoughts about Blade Runner were rather strongly influenced by entry in Roger Ebert’s Journal, I Remember You.
A meaningful article about a sadly meaningless film. At the end of the film, when the (indeed, looney tunes moment) the rolling ship finally crushed the vastly flat and undefined “bitch” character played by Charlize Theron, I remember thinking, “Alas, poor Charlize. I knew you. I knew you well. In “Monster”; in other films. In better roles.”
Additionally, my husband and I emerged the theater both questioning how in the world anyone really understood the ill-intentions of the engineers towards Earth. I mean, I saw the jars…..the holographic map which clearly showed Earth….but everyone seemed like rock-solid proof had been demonstrated that the engineers meant specifically to travel to Earth and plant their goop jars to eradicate the human population. I never saw it.
Well, safe to say that Prometheus hurt me, deeply. Great review….and you have my sympathies. We are equal in disappointment.
Thank you so much. That scene is, and always will be, my favourite scene from Blade Runner. ♥
Thank you, also, for the scoop and links about Prometheus. =0)
Thank you for the link to another super-cool blog! ♥
*squishy hugs and happy dancing*
LOL, you are twice welcome. (That’s my favorite scene from blade runner too. I couldn’t resist including it. …or watching it a couple times, just cause it’s there now.)
While I liked the movie more than you did, I appreciate your review. Well argued. And I loved the link to aknittysociety. Another interesting blogger.
On the subject of mortality and the human condition, all are advised to read “The Denial of Death” by Ernest Becker. It won a Pulitzer Prize in the 1970s. More than one person has told me that it is the single most important book they’ve ever read.
Thanks for your review. I rarely go to the movies (stopped going a while back because I typically would leave the theater greatly disappointed) and wait for the movie to come out on video. When I saw the trailers for “Prometheus,” I thought for sure this was one to see on the big screen but I guess I’ll (once again) wait for the video.
This movie was a disappointment. Despite significant pre-gaming and good company, there were very few moments of “wow” that justified the time and money to see the film – and those few moments were generated by special effects.
I didn’t like any of the characters – they were shallow and poorly written: Surely professionals of the calibre required for such a scientific undertaking would be far less self-absorbed, far more professional, far more intelligent than this motley crew. Every time each character had a chance of making an excellent statement, an opportunity to express a deep thought or an opportunity to do real science they did something other, something illogical to the situation, something inapt to the character’s presence in the situation and in the film.
But hot damn, those special effects were great!
i think it is so damn cute that you expect a hollywood movie to have a solid plot AND character development… ah well, good to dream Dan… good to dream
I must say I didn’t expect much from this film but was pleasantly surprised (admittedly more by the horror elements than philosophising). Anyway, although at first disappointed at the lack of communicativeness of the engineers, I think it makes it more interesting to draw your own conclusion for what they did and what they’re going to do. For me people on the ship represented humanity and their stupid actions only showed why the aliens would want to kill us all. I certainly wouldn’t blame them. 😀
Evan M said:
As a geologist (paleontologist), I have to disagree with your critique on the geologist character. While many of us fall into the stereotypical intellectual scientist category, many others could also be likened to the “rock stars” of the scientific world who love nothing more than doing field work that involves actual science during the day and smoking pot and drinking beer by the campfire at night. I remember classmates in a paleontology course griping about how much they hated the class since they weren’t interested in biology and only wanted to look at rocks. I actually laughed out loud in the theater when the geologist when on his frightened rant about how he loved rocks and had no interest in giant, headless aliens. Sounded spot on to me.
My husband has been looking forward to this movie…I’ll have to break the news to him…
Lots of people love it, …just not usually for the story.
your review is great, I agree deffinitely, and I also think that the first scene in the movie was the best one, i’ve thought about it quite a lot, and about how much potential was wasted, really too bad that all they did was ask (literally) really interesting questions about our “species” and our planet without even thinking about answering any of it. but it sure looked pretty. the special effects where great, everything looked really cool, just too bad that it was a terrible story. and well it is hard to compare to a movie like blade runner, but your review is really great! thanks for sharing.
The cinematography in the first 20 minutes of Prometheus is stunning! I pretty much agree with all you’ve said about the rest. I think Elizabeth soldiering on only minutes after basically having her womb removed takes the staunch female lead character to a level even Sigourneys Ripley never attained!
Blade Runner is one of my favorite movies for many reasons, but the thing I think makes it really excellent is the fact that the movie actually makes you feel empathy for all the characters, even Leon!
Prometheus was a huge letdown. Like you said the trailer was brilliant, it drew me in immediately. Did they have to show the ship crashing in the trailer? Guy Pearce was wasted in this movie, with all that make-up anyone could have played him. Noomi’s emergency medical procedure was a great scene, but her “recovery”, even on drugs, was over the top. Roy’s lines are forever etched in my brain…”Like tears in the rain”… Good review!